State Legislative Brief
ASSAM, GOA, GUJARAT, HARYANA, HIMACHAL, KARNATAKA, MP, ODISHA, PUNJAB, RAJASTHAN, UTTARAKHAND, UP
Ordinances and Notifications providing relaxation of labour laws
Key Features
|
Issues to Consider
|
Currently, there are over 100 state laws and 40 central laws regulating various aspects of labour such as resolution of industrial disputes, working conditions, social security, and wages.[1] To improve ease of compliance and ensure uniformity in labour laws, the Second National Commission on Labour (2002) recommended that existing labour laws should be consolidated.[2] Over the last couple of years, the central government has introduced four labour Codes in Parliament to replace the existing central labour laws related to wages, occupational safety and health, industrial relations, and social security. Of these, Parliament has passed the Code on Wages, 2019.
However, labour falls under the Concurrent List of the Constitution.[3] Therefore, both Parliament and state legislatures may make laws regulating labour. States regulate labour by passing their own laws, or amending central labour laws to be applicable to the state. In cases where the central and state laws are incompatible, the central law will prevail. However, a state law that is incompatible with central laws may prevail in that state if it has received the assent of the President.[4]
To contain the spread of COVID-19 in India, the central government imposed a nation-wide lockdown on March 24, 2020.[5] Under the lockdown, most economic activities, other than those classified as essential activities, were suspended. States have noted that this loss of economic activity has resulted in a loss of income for many individuals and businesses.[6],[7] To allow economic activities to restart and attract new investment, some states have provided relaxations from existing labour laws and regulations to certain establishments. This note analyses the key issues with regard to the relaxation of these labour laws.
Key Changes and Issues for Consideration
Various states have passed relaxations to labour laws in an attempt to attract investment and promote economic growth. This has been done primarily in two ways: (i) by increasing the work hour limits for factories, and (ii) by exempting establishments from certain labour laws (in case of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh). Madhya Pradesh has provided exemption to factories from laws regulating certain aspects such as industrial dispute resolution, health and safety facilities, and inspections. Uttar Pradesh has proposed to exempt factories from all labour laws, subject to certain conditions. We analyse key issues with the changes being brought by the states.
Changes in work hours
As the lockdown to contain the spread of COVID-19 is being relaxed, factories have been allowed to function. However, some state governments noted that the lockdown has led to a shortage of workers. In this context, Assam, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh governments issued notifications to increase the maximum daily work hours for workers in their state to 12 hours. Karnataka and Uttarakhand increased maximum daily work hours to 10 hours and 11 hours, respectively (12 hours in case of continuous process industries in Uttarakhand). Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh subsequently withdrew their notifications. Table 1 shows the state-wise changes made in maximum daily and weekly work hours for factories.
The Factories Act, 1948 allows state governments to exempt factories from its provisions under certain conditions. States have used two different provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 to change work hours. These provisions are: (i) three-month exemption in case of a public emergency (Section 5), and (ii) exemption to allow factories to deal with an exceptional amount of work (Section 65).[8] Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, and Uttarakhand have used the ‘public emergency’ exemption to increase work hours. A public emergency is defined as a grave emergency where there is a threat to national security by war, external aggression, or internal disturbance. It is unclear if the COVID-19 pandemic or the lockdown can be considered a public emergency under this definition. Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh had also used the public emergency exemption to increase work hours, but withdrew their notifications after these were challenged in High Courts.
Assam, Goa, Haryana, and Punjab have changed work hours under the exemption allowed in case of exceptional amount of work. The 1948 Act specifies the following conditions for such an exemption: (i) work hours cannot exceed 60 hours in a week, (ii) work hours cannot exceed 12 hours in a day and the spread of work cannot exceed 13 hours (including intervals of rest), and (iii) workers cannot work overtime for more than seven days at a stretch and for more than 75 hours in a quarter.
Note that India has ratified the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 adopted by the General Conference of the International Labour Organisation.[9] The Convention specifies that maximum work hours should not exceed nine hours in a day and 48 hours in a week for industrial undertakings. In cases where processes need to be carried out continuously, the maximum weekly work hours should not exceed 56 hours.
Table 1: State-wise changes to maximum daily and weekly work hours
State |
Establishments |
Maximum weekly work hours |
Maximum daily work hours |
Overtime pay |
Time period |
Assam[10] |
All factories |
Not specified |
Increased to 12 hours |
Required |
Three months |
Goa[11] |
All factories |
Increased from 48 hours to 60 hours |
Increased to 12 hours |
Required |
Approximately three months |
Gujarat[12] |
All factories |
Increased to 72 hours |
Increased to 12 hours |
Not required |
Three months |
Haryana[13] |
All factories |
Not specified |
Increased to 12 hours |
Required |
Two months |
Himachal Pradesh[14] |
All factories |
Increased to 72 hours |
Increased to 12 hours |
Required |
Three months |
Madhya Pradesh[15] |
All factories |
Increased to 72 hours |
Increased to 12 hours |
Required |
Three months |
Odisha[16] |
All factories |
Increased from 48 hours to 72 hours |
Increased from 8 hours to 12 hours |
Required |
Three months |
Punjab[17] |
All factories |
Not specified |
Increased from 9 hours to 12 hours |
Required |
Three months |
All factories and continuous process industries allowed to work by the state government |
Maximum 6 days of work in a week |
Increased from 8 hours to 11 hours (12 hours in case of continuous process industries) |
Required |
Three months |
|
Karnataka*[20] |
All factories |
Increased to 60 hours |
Increased to 10 hours |
Required |
Withdrawn[21] |
Rajasthan*7 |
All factories |
Increased from 48 hours to 72 hours |
Increased from 8 hours to 12 hours |
Required |
Withdrawn[22] |
Uttar Pradesh*[23] |
All factories |
Increased to 72 hours |
Increased to 12 hours |
Not required |
Withdrawn[24] |
Note: *withdrawn. Payment for overtime in Gujarat will be done at a proportionate rate, not at double rate as per the Factories Act, 1948.
Sources: Respective state notifications; PRS.
Wages for overtime work
The Factories Act, 1948 requires the employer to pay overtime wages to workers employed for more than 9 hours in any day or for more than 48 hours in any week (Section 54 and 51). Such overtime pay must be double the ordinary wages. For example, if a worker earns a wage of Rs 30 per hour for working up to 9 hours in a day, then he must be paid his wage at Rs 60 per hour for any overtime work done in that day beyond 9 hours. The Gujarat government has increased the permissible work hours in all factories from 9 hours per day to 12 hours per day, and from 48 hours per week to 72 hours per week, through a notification. For any work done beyond 9 hours in a day, or 48 hours in a week, the notification requires employers to pay wages proportionately, i.e. at the same rate as the ordinary wage rate, which is in contravention of the Factories Act, 1948.
Madhya Pradesh
The Madhya Pradesh government has exempted establishments from certain labour laws as a means to attract investment and promote economic growth.[25] Table 2 shows the laws covered under these exemptions.
Table 2: Laws exempted for various establishments in Madhya Pradesh
Mechanism |
Law exempted/amended |
Change |
Implication |
|
|
||
Notification under Section 36B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 |
|
|
|
Notification under Section 1 of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 |
|
|
|
Notification under Section 5 of the Factories Act, 1948. |
|
|
|
Notification under Section 8 and Section 112 of the Factories Act, 1948. |
|
|
|
Sources: Respective state and central level Acts; Various notifications, Labour Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, https://prsindia.org/files/covid19/notifications/4989.MP_exemptions%20under%20labour%20laws_May05.pdf; PRS.
Rationale for Exemptions
Madhya Pradesh has exempted various establishments from provisions of central and state level labour laws as specified in Table 2 above. The aim of providing these exemptions is to facilitate greater investment in the state by new companies and boost economic activity by existing companies. This raises two issues discussed below.
Temporary exemption
Madhya Pradesh has provided temporary exemptions to establishments from certain labour laws for varying amounts of time. For example, new factories will be exempted from all provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, except those pertaining to lay-off and retrenchment of workers, closing down of an undertaking, and restarting of undertakings, for 1,000 days.[27] Further, factories will be exempted from provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 such as those related to providing for crèches, washrooms, disposal of wastes, and dangerous operations for a period of three months.25
Since the aim of providing exemptions to new companies is to attract investment, a temporary exemption from labour laws may not serve the purpose. Considering the duration of time required to set up a factory and start operations, the benefit of these exemptions may be available for a limited period of time only.
Labour law exemptions may not attract investment on their own
The Second National Commission on Labour (2002) observed that the existing labour legislation in India is complex, with out-dated provisions and inconsistent definitions.2 Further, the 2018-19 Economic Survey identified labour regulations as one of the reasons for inadequate growth of businesses, as these regulations exempt smaller firms from compliance, thus incentivising them to remain small.[28] However, the National Commission on Labour (2002) noted that labour laws are not the only reason for the inability to attract foreign investment in comparison to certain other countries.2 Other factors affecting the efficiency of industry include efficient and reliable infrastructure such as transport and electricity, access to requisite and timely flows of credit, access to materials, constantly improving and competitive technology, and government policies.2
Exemptions may be in conflict with laws proposed by the central government
Since labour is a concurrent subject, the central government can also pass laws regulating it. In case any central law is enacted in the future which is incompatible with the exemptions provided by states, the central law will prevail and the exemptions will be void. Note that the central government has introduced three labour Codes in Parliament to replace the existing central labour laws related to occupational safety and health, industrial relations, and social security. Further, Parliament passed the Code on Wages, 2019 to replace existing labour laws related to payment of wages, which will repeal the existing laws once notified.
Also, the health and safety law introduced in Parliament subsumes the Factories Act, 1948 and the industrial relations law subsumes the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Provisions of both these Acts have been exempted by Madhya Pradesh. Therefore, the exemptions could be reversed with the passage of the central level laws.
Factories are exempted from provisions regarding health, safety, and working conditions
Factories are exempted from certain provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 ensuring provision of basic health, safety, and working conditions for workers.25 For example, factories are no longer required to provide for crèches, washrooms, drinking water, lighting, ventilation, disposal of wastes, and dangerous operations. In addition, factories have been exempted from penalties prescribed for various offences under the Act, including: (i) not taking remedial action in case of imminent danger from hazardous processes, (ii) not disclosing information on dangers involved in hazardous processes, (iii) not appointing qualified workers for handling hazardous substances, and (iv) not providing necessary facilities for protecting workers part of such work.
The Second National Commission on Labour (2002) recommended that all establishments should be covered by laws relating to health and safety of workers.2 Further, the Supreme Court held in Consumer Education and Research Centre vs Union of India (1995) that the right to health and medical care to protect one’s health and vigour is a fundamental right of a worker under Article 21 of the Constitution.[29]
Exemptions for regulation of industrial disputes for certain establishments
The Madhya Pradesh government has exempted all new factories from certain provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.27 Provisions related to lay-off and retrenchment of workers, and closure of establishments continue to apply. However, the other provisions such as those related to industrial dispute resolution, collective bargaining, strikes and lockouts, and trade unions, are not applicable for new factories. These exemptions will apply for a period of 1,000 days (33 months) from the date of notification (May 5, 2020). Further, Madhya Pradesh has also permanently exempted establishments in certain industries such as textiles, iron and steel, sugar, and chemicals from all provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960.[30] The 1960 Act regulates the settlement of industrial disputes, and employee-employer relations.[31] This raises two issues.
No mechanism for industrial dispute resolution for certain establishments
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 allows the state government to exempt certain establishments from the provisions of the Act if an adequate mechanism is in place for the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes.[32] However, after this notification, new factories in certain industries such as textiles, iron and steel, sugar, and chemicals will not be regulated by any such mechanism. Therefore, the provision under the 1947 Act allowing the state government to exempt certain establishments from its provisions may no longer be applicable.
Right to collective bargaining
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provides a collective bargaining mechanism to the employers and workers for settling their disputes. It also classifies any interference with the workers’ right to collective bargaining as an unfair labour practice. Such a mechanism may not be available in case of the new factories in Madhya Pradesh due to exemption from the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Note that the International Labour Organisation recognised right to collective bargaining as a fundamental right under its 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.[33] This requires India to give effect to the principle of right to collective bargaining, even though it has not ratified the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949.[34] Therefore, the Second National Commission on Labour (2002) noted that the right to collective bargaining is inalienable and must accrue to every worker under any system of labour laws and labour policy.2
Uttar Pradesh
The Uttar Pradesh Cabinet has approved the Uttar Pradesh Temporary Exemption from Certain Labour Laws Ordinance, 2020.6 As the Ordinance seeks to provide exemption from several central Acts, it would require the President’s assent. According to a draft of the Ordinance, it seeks to exempt all factories and establishments engaged in manufacturing processes from all labour laws for a period of three years, subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions.[35] These conditions include:
Key issues based on these provisions are discussed below.
Definition of “labour laws”
The Ordinance exempts all factories and manufacturing establishments from all labour laws for a period of three years, subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions summarised above. Since the Ordinance does not define the term “labour laws”, it is unclear which laws will continue to apply for the specified establishments and which laws will come under exemptions. As per the existing regulations, there are 40 central labour laws and eight state labour laws in force in Uttar Pradesh. These laws regulate various aspects related to labour such as wages, social security, occupational safety and health, and industrial disputes. Also, there are specific labour laws for classes such as contract labourers, migrant workers, unorganised workers, and children. In addition, certain workplaces such as mines, construction sites, plantations, and sugar mills are also required to comply with industry-specific laws.
Provisions for safety and security
The Ordinance specifies that the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 relating to safety and security of workers will remain applicable. However, it does not specify the specific sections or Chapters of the Act that will remain applicable. Therefore, it is unclear if such provisions will also include health and work hour related provisions under the Act which impact the safety of workers, such as limits on working hours, mandatory intervals of rest, effective disposal of wastes and effluents, adequate ventilation, and reasonable temperature.
Labour law provisions for women and children
The Ordinance specifies that provisions of various labour laws relating to the employment of children and women will remain applicable. However, it does not list out the Acts or specific provisions in different Acts. It is unclear if establishments employing women or children are required to comply with the provisions or laws only specific to women and children, or with all labour laws regulating their employment such as the Factories Act, 1948 and the Unorganized Workers’ Social Security Act, 2008.
Under the existing mechanism, there are certain laws which are specific to women and children such as the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, and the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. In addition, other labour laws have specific provisions regulating their terms of employment. For example, the Factories Act, 1948 provides for certain restrictions to work hours for women and children. It also requires factories to provide crèches in certain cases and prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years.
[1] “Suggested Labour Policy Reforms”, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry, 2014.
[2] Report of the Second National Commission on Labour, Ministry of Labour and Employment, 2002.
[3] Seventh Schedule, List III, Constitution of India.
[4] Article 254, Constitution of India.
[5] Order No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A), Ministry of Home Affairs, March 24, 2020.
[6] Press Release on Cabinet Decisions, Government of Uttar Pradesh, May 6, 2020.
[7] Order No. F3(15) Legal/F&B/2020/188, Factories and Boilers Inspection Department, Government of Rajasthan, April 11, 2020.
[8] Factories Act, 1948, https://labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/TheFactoriesAct1948.pdf.
[9] Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919, International Labour Organisation.
[10] Notification No. GLR.170/2019/Pt./4, Labour Welfare Department, Government of Assam, May 8, 2020.
[11] Order No. CIF/092(Part-2)/S-II/IFB/2020/191, Department of Labour, Government of Goa, May 7, 2020.
[12] Notification No. GHR/2020/56/FAC/142020/346/M3, Labour and Employment Department, Government of Gujarat, April 17, 2020.
[13] Notification No. 2/17/2020-2Lab, Labour Department, Government of Haryana, April 29, 2020.
[14] Notification No. (A)4-3/2017, Labour and Employment Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, April 21, 2020.
[15] Notification No. 247-2020-A-XVI, Labour Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, April 22, 2020.
[16] Notification No. LL2-FE-0003-20202716/LESI, Labour and ESI Department, Government of Odisha, May 8, 2020.
[17] Notification No. 21/07/2015-5L/503, Department of Labour, Government of Punjab, April 20, 2020.
[18] Notification No. VIII/20-91/2008, Labour Department, Government of Uttarakhand, April 28, 2020.
[19] Notification No. VIII/20-91/2008, Labour Department, Government of Uttarakhand, May 5, 2020.
[20] Notification No. KAE 33 KABANI 2020, Labour Department, Government of Karnataka, May 22, 2020.
[21] Notification No. KAE 3 KABANI 2020, Labour Department, Government of Karnataka, June 11, 2020.
[22] Order No. F3(15) Legal/F&B/2020/301, Factories and Boilers Inspection Department, Government of Rajasthan, May 24, 2020.
[23] Notification No. 13/2020/502/36-03-2020-30(Sa.)/2020TC, Labour Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh, May 8, 2020.
[24] Notification No. 15/2020/511/36-03-2020-30(Sa.)/2020TC, Labour Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh, May 15, 2020.
[25] Notification No. 958-02-2020-A-16, Labour Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, May 5, 2020.
[26] The Madhya Pradesh Labour Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, Madhya Pradesh Gazette, May 6, 2020.
[27] Notification No. 956-02-2020-A-16, Labour Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, May 5, 2020.
[28] Chapter 3, Volume 1, Economic Survey 2018-19, Ministry of Finance, July 2019.
[29] Consumer Education and Research Centre vs Union of India, 1995 SCC (3) 42.
[30] Notification No. 957-02-2020-A-16, Labour Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, May 5, 2020.
[31] The Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960, http://www.lawsofindia.org/pdf/madhya_pradesh/1960/1960MP27.pdf.
[32] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, https://labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/THEINDUSTRIALDISPUTES_ACT1947_0.pdf.
[33] ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, International Labour Organisation, June 1998.
[34] ILO conventions ratified by India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, as on June 12, 2020.
[35] Draft of the Uttar Pradesh Temporary Exemption from Certain Labour Laws Ordinance, 2020, Live Law, https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/pdf_upload-374550.pdf.
DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.