• The Employee’s Compensation (Amendment) Bill, 2016 was introduced in Lok Sabha on August 5, 2016 by the Minister for Labour and Employment, Mr. Bandaru Dattatreya.  
  • The Bill amends the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923.  The Act provides payment of compensation to employees and their dependants in the case of injury by industrial accidents, including occupational diseases.
  • Duty to inform employee of right to compensation: The Bill introduces a provision which requires an employer to inform the employee of his right to compensation under the Act.  Such information must be given in writing (in English, Hindi or the relevant official language) at the time of employing him. 
  • Penalty for failure to inform: The Bill penalises an employer if he fails to inform his employee of his right to compensation.  Such penalty may be between fifty thousand to one lakh rupees.
  • Appeals from the Commissioner’s order: The Act provides that any dispute related to an employee’s compensation will be heard by a Commissioner (with powers of a civil court).  Appeals from the Commissioner’s order, related to a substantial question of law, will lie before the High Court. 
  • Further, the Act stipulates that appeals can be made against orders related to compensation, distribution of compensation, award of penalty or interest, etc. only if the amount in dispute is at least three hundred rupees.
  • The Bill raises this amount to ten thousand rupees.  It permits the central government to further raise this amount.
  • Withholding payments pending appeal: Under the Act, if an employer has appealed against a Commissioner’s order, any payments towards the employee can be temporarily withheld.  The Commissioner may do so only by an order of the High Court, until the matter is disposed of by the Court.  The Bill deletes this provision.


DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for noncommercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.