Consumer Affairs and Food Distribution
IntroducedLok SabhaDec 22, 2011
ReferredStanding CommitteeJan 05, 2012
ReportStanding CommitteeJan 17, 2013
WithdrawnLok SabhaAug 07, 2013
Highlights of the Bill
- The Bill proposes foodgrain entitlements for up to 75 percent of the rural and up to 50 percent of the urban population. Of these, at least 46 percent of the rural and 28 percent of the urban population will be designated as priority households. The rest will be designated as general households.
|Image Credit: www.pib.nic.in|
- Priority households will be entitled to 7 kg of subsidised foodgrains per person per month. General households will be entitled to at least 3 kg.
- The central government will determine the percentage of people in each state that will belong to the priority and general groups. State governments will identify households that belong to these groups.
- The Bill proposes meal entitlements to specific groups. These include: pregnant women and lactating mothers, children between the ages of six months and 14 years, malnourished children, disaster affected persons, and destitute, homeless and starving persons.
- Grievance redressal mechanisms will be set up at the district, state, and central levels of government.
- The Bill proposes reforms to the Targeted Public Distribution System.
Key Issues and Analysis
- The Bill classifies beneficiaries into three groups. The process of identifying beneficiaries and placing them into these groups may lead to large inclusion and exclusion errors.
- Several entitlements and the grievance redressal structure would require state legislatures to make adequate budgetary allocations. Implementation of the Bill may be affected if states do not pass requisite allocations in their budgets or do not possess adequate funds.
- The Bill does not provide a rationale for the cut-off numbers prescribed for entitlements to priority and general households.
- The grievance redressal framework may overlap with that provided in the Citizens’ Charter Bill that is pending in Parliament.
- Schedule III of the Bill specifies goals which may not be directly related to food security. It is unclear why these have been included in the Bill.
- The Bill provides similar definitions for starving and destitute persons. However, entitlements to the two groups differ.
Read the complete analysis here
DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.
- Report Summary - Rangarajan Report on Food Security
- Comparison of the Bill, Official Amendments and Standing Committee Report
- PRS Bill Summary
- PRS Legislative Brief
- Report Summary - CACP Report on the National Food Security Bill
- Comparison of the Bill, Standing Committee recommendations and the National Food Security Ordinance
- बिल के मुख्य मुद्दे
- Comparison of the Standing Committee recommendations and the National Food Security Bill
- Chhattisgarh Food Security Act, 2012
- Text of Ordinance
- CACP Report on Food Security Bill
- Report of the Expert Group (NC Saxena) on the methodology for the BPL Census 2009
- Report of the Expert Committee on National Food Security Bill
- NAC Bill
- Chapter 2 - Economic Survey 2011-2012 PDS
- Justice Wadhwa Committee Report on PDS