- The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 27, 2026. It seeks to amend the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. The Act aims to prevent unfair means in public examinations conducted by specified public examination authorities. These include: (i) Union Public Service Commission, (ii) Staff Selection Commission, (iii) Railway Recruitment Boards, (iv) Institute of Banking Personnel Selection, (v) National Testing Agency, (vi) Ministries of the central government and their attached offices, and (vii) other authorities notified by the central government.
-
Increase in penalties: The Bill increases the quantum of imprisonment and fines for various offences (Table 1).
Table 1: Penalty under the Act and the Bill
|
Offence |
Act |
Bill |
|
Use of unfair means by a person |
Imprisonment between three and five years, and a fine up to Rs 10 lakh |
Imprisonment between five and 10 years, and fine up to Rs 50 lakh |
|
Unfair means by a service provider |
Fine up to one crore rupees |
Fine up to five crore rupees |
|
Persons-in-charge of a service provider |
Imprisonment between three and 10 years, and a fine of one crore rupees |
Minimum imprisonment: five years, and fine: five crore rupees |
|
Organised crime |
Imprisonment between five and 10 years, and fine not less than one crore rupees |
Minimum imprisonment: seven years, and minimum fine: Rs 10 crore |
-
Debarment of service providers: The Act also debars a service provider engaging in unfair means for four years, from being assigned any responsibility for conduct of any public examination. The Bill enhances the period of debarment to eight years.
-
Special Task Force for investigation: Under the Act, the central government may refer investigation of offences to any central investigating agency. The Bill empowers the central government to constitute a special task force to investigate offences.
-
Timeline for investigation: The Bill adds that investigation of offences must be completed within two months.
-
Special Fast Track Courts: The Bill requires every state and UT to designate a Court of Session as a Special Fast Track Court to try offences under the Act. The Special Fast Track Courts will also try any connected offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 or other laws, in the same trial. Every state and UT must also appoint one or more special public prosecutors for each Special Fast Track Court. All pending cases under the Act will stand transferred to Special Fast Track Courts.
-
Timeline for trial: The Bill adds that trials must be conducted on a day-to-day basis. The Court may adjourn to the following day, if necessary, after recording reasons in writing. Trial must be completed within three months from the date of filing of the chargesheet. Trial in the transferred pending cases must be completed within three months from the date of transfer.
-
Appeal: The Bill adds that appeals against judgments, sentences, or orders of the Special Fast Track Courts will lie before a bench of two Judges of the High Court. Appeals must be disposed of, as far as possible, within three months from admission. Appeals against orders granting or refusing bail will also lie before the High Court. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the order. The High Court may entertain delay for sufficient cause, but no appeal may be entertained after 90 days.
DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.
