लॉकडाउन से पहले की अवधि: रोकथाम के लिए शुरुआती उपाय
चीन के वुहान से लौटने वाले व्यक्ति में कोविड-19 की पुष्टि के बाद राज्य का शुरुआती कदम यह था कि चीन से आने वाले सभी यात्रियों और उनके संपर्क में आने वालों की जांच की जाए, उन्हें चिन्हित किया जाए और संकट आधारित वर्गीकरण किया जाए। 2 और 3 फरवरी को दो और मामलों के बाद सरकार ने राज्य में हेल्थ इमरजेंसी की घोषणा कर दी।
इसके बाद एक हेल्थ एडवाइजरी जारी की गई जिसमें कहा गया कि 15 जनवरी, 2020 के बाद वुहान से लौटने वाले सभी यात्रियों को ट्रैक और चिन्हित किया जाएगा और उनकी जांच की जाएगी। ऐसे यात्रियों और उनके संपर्क में आने वाले लोगों को 28 दिनों तक आइसोलेशन में रखा जाएगा। इस एडवाइजरी में सभी लॉजिंग इस्टैबलिशमेंट्स को निर्देश दिया गया कि वे कोरोना प्रभावित देशों की ट्रैवल हिस्ट्री वाले यात्रियों का एक रजिस्टर बनाएं। ऐसी एडवाइजरी विदेशों से लौटने वाले विद्यार्थियों के लिए भी जारी की गई। इसके बाद तत्काल कोई पुष्ट मामला न मिलने के बाद 12 फरवरी को राज्य ने हेल्थ इमरेंजसी की एडवाइजरी वापस ले ली। हालांकि उच्च स्तर पर प्रतिक्रिया और निगरानी जारी रखी गई।
संक्रमण का दूसरा दौर
मार्च की शुरुआत में संक्रमण के दूसरे दौर के बाद सरकार ने इस संकट से निपटने के लिए कई उपाय किए। ये इस प्रकार हैं:
लॉकडाउन की अवधि
23 मार्च को केरल ने 31 मार्च तक के लिए राज्य व्यापी लॉकडाउन की घोषणा की। एक दिन बाद केंद्र सरकार ने देश व्यापी 21 दिनों के लॉकडाउन की घोषणा की।
राज्य के आदेश के अनुसार निम्नलिखित प्रतिबंध लगाए गए: (i) सभी प्रकार की यात्री परिवहन सेवाओं को बंद करना, (ii) पांच से अधिक लोगों के जमावड़े पर प्रतिबंध और (iii) सभी कमर्शियल इस्टैबलिशमेंट्स, कार्यालयों और कारखानों को बंद करना, सिर्फ उन्हें छोड़कर जिन्हें छूट दी गई है। सिर्फ अनिवार्य वस्तुओं की खरीद या मेडिकल इमरजेंसी हेतु टैक्सी, ऑटो या निजी वाहनों के इस्तेमाल की अनुमति दी गई। अनिवार्य वस्तुओं या सेवाओं को प्रदान करने वाले इस्टैबलिशमेंट्स, जैसे बैंक, मीडिया, टेलीकॉम सेवा, पेट्रोल पंप और अस्पतालों को काम करने की अनुमति दी गई।
15 अप्रैल को केंद्र सरकार ने लॉकडाउन को 3 मई तक बढ़ा दिया। लॉकडाउन की अवधि के दौरान सरकार के कुछ उपाय निम्नलिखित हैं:
प्रशासनिक उपाय
स्वास्थ्य उपाय
अनिवार्य वस्तुएं और सेवाएं
कल्याणकारी उपाय
लॉकडाउन बाद की रणनीतियां – लॉकडाउन के प्रतिबंधों से छूट देने वाली रणनीतियां
कोविड-19 के प्रसार पर अधिक जानकारी और महामारी पर केंद्र एवं राज्य सरकारों की प्रतिक्रियाओं के लिए कृपया यहां देखें।
Parliament deliberates on matters that are complex, and therefore needs technical expertise to understand such matters better. Committees help with this by providing a forum where Members can engage with domain experts and government officials during the course of their study. For example, the Committee on Health and Family Welfare studied the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016 which prohibits commercial surrogacy, but allows altruistic surrogacy. As MPs come from varying backgrounds, they may not have had the expertise to understand the details around surrogacy such as fertility issues, abortion, and regulation of surrogacy clinics, among others. The Committee called upon a range of stakeholders including the National Commission for Women, doctors, and government officials to better their understanding of the issues, before finalising their report.
Committees also provide a forum for building consensus across political parties. The proceedings of the House during sessions are televised, and MPs are likely to stick to their party positions on most matters. Committees have closed door meetings, which allows them to freely question and discuss issues and arrive at a consensus.
After a Committee completes its study, it publishes its report which is laid in Parliament. These recommendations are not binding, however, they hold a lot of weight. For example, the Standing Committee on Health made several recommendations to the National Medical Commission Bill in 2017. Many of these were incorporated in the recently passed 2019 Bill, including removing the provision for allowing a bridge course for AYUSH practitioners.
There are 24 such Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs), each of which oversees a set of Ministries. DRSCs were set up first in 1993, to ensure Parliament could keep with the growing complexity of governance. These are permanent Committees that are reconstituted every year. They consist of 21 Members from Lok Sabha, and 10 Members from Rajya Sabha, and are headed by a Chairperson. The DRSCs primarily look at three things: (i) Bills, (ii) budgets, and (iii) subject specific issues for examination. Other types of Standing Committees include Financial Committees which facilitate Parliament’s scrutiny over government expenditure. Besides these, Parliament can also form ad hoc Committees for a specific purpose such as addressing administrative issues, examining a Bill, or examining an issue.
To ensure that a Bill is scrutinised properly before it is passed, our law making procedure has a provision for Bills to be referred to a DRSC for detailed examination. Any Bill introduced in Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha can be referred to a DRSC by either the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. Over the years, the Committees have immensely contributed to strengthen the laws passed by Parliament. For example, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, overhauling the 1986 law, was recently passed during the Budget Session. An earlier version of the Bill had been examined by the Committee on Food and Consumer Affairs, which suggested several amendments such as increasing penalties for misleading advertisements, making certain definitions clearer. The government accepted most of these recommendations and incorporated them in the 2019 Act.
Besides Bills, the DRSCs also examine the budget. The detailed estimates of expenditure of all ministries, called Demand for Grants are sent for examination to the DRCSs. They study the demands to examine the trends in allocations, spending by the ministries, utilisation levels, and the policy priorities of each ministry. However, only a limited proportion of the budget is usually discussed on the floor of the House. In the recently dissolved16th Lok Sabha, 17% of the budget was discussed in the House.
Committees also examine policy issues in their respective Ministries, and make suggestions to the government. The government has to report back on whether these recommendations have been accepted or not. Based on this, the Committees then table an Action Taken Report, which shows status of the government’s action on each recommendation.
While Committees have substantially impacted Parliament’s efficacy in discharging its roles, there is still scope for strengthening the Committee system. In the 16th Lok Sabha, DRSCs examined 41 Bills, 331 Demands for Grants, 197 issues, and published 503 Action Taken Reports.
|
However, the rules do not require that all Bills be examined by a Committee. This leads to some Bills being passed without the advantage of a Committee scrutinising its technical details. Recently, there has been a declining trend in the percentage of Bills being referred to a Committee. In the 15th LS, 71% of the Bills introduced were referred to Committees for examination, as compared to 27% in the 16th Lok Sabha. |
 |
With the DRSCs now constituted for the first year of the 17th Lok Sabha, they will soon begin their meetings to select the subjects they are going to examine. Some Committees already have Bills to examine that were referred to them during the 16th Lok Sabha. Some of these Bills are: (i) the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill, 2019, (ii) the Allied and Healthcare Professions Bill, 2018, and (iii) the Registration of Marriage of Non- Resident Indian Bill, 2019. So far in the 17th Lok Sabha no Bill has been referred to a Committee yet.
